Stent Placement versus Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Obstructive Lesions of the Popliteal Artery: A Prospective, Multi-centre, Randomized Trial Running title: Rastan et al; Stent versus PTA in Popliteal Artery Treatment
نویسندگان
چکیده
Kardiologie und Angiologie II, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen; Universitäres Herz-und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg; Klinik und Poliklinik für Angiologie, Departement Herz und Gefässe, Universität Bern, Bern; Uniklinikum Heidelberg, Medizinische Klinik, Innere Medizin III, Heidelberg; Ev.-Luth. Diakonissenkrankenhaus, Abteilung Radiologie, Flensburg; Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin, Abteilung für Angiologie, Graz; Klinische und Interventionelle Angiologie, Universität Leipzig-Herzzentrum, Leipzig; Universitätsklinik für Radiodiagnostik, Medizinische Universität, Wien; HochrheinEggberg Klinik, Institut für Radiologie, Bad Säckingen, Germany
منابع مشابه
Stent placement versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of obstructive lesions of the popliteal artery: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial.
BACKGROUND Stenting has been shown to improve patency after femoral artery revascularization compared with balloon angioplasty. Limited data are available evaluating endovascular treatment for obstructive lesions of the popliteal artery. METHODS AND RESULTS This prospective, randomized, multicenter trial compared primary nitinol stent placement to percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty...
متن کاملStent Placement versus Balloon Angioplasty for the Treatment of Obstructive Lesions of the Popliteal Artery: A Prospective, Multi-centre, Randomized Trial
Kardiologie und Angiologie II, Universitäts-Herzzentrum Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Bad Krozingen; Universitäres Herz-und Gefäßzentrum Hamburg, Hamburg; Klinik und Poliklinik für Angiologie, Departement Herz und Gefässe, Universität Bern, Bern; Uniklinikum Heidelberg, Medizinische Klinik, Innere Medizin III, Heidelberg; Ev.-Luth. Diakonissenkrankenhaus, Abteilung Radiologie, Flensburg; Universitäts...
متن کامل“ Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for
Letter by Chalmers Regarding Article “Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery: Twelve-Month Results From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial” To the Editor: The authors of the RESILIENT trial1 have adopted a trial design that by their own admission is controversial. They have randomly assigned patients to eithe...
متن کاملNitinol stent implantation versus balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral artery and proximal popliteal artery: twelve-month results from the RESILIENT randomized trial.
BACKGROUND Controversy still exists regarding the best endovascular treatment strategy for patients with symptomatic disease of the superficial femoral artery. There are conflicting data regarding the benefits of superficial femoral artery stenting and the role of primary stenting compared with balloon angioplasty with provisional stent implantation. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 206 patient...
متن کاملLow-Dose Paclitaxel–Coated Versus Uncoated Percutaneous Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease
BACKGROUND Numerous studies have reported favorable outcomes using drug-coated balloons (DCBs) for treatment of symptomatic peripheral artery disease of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. However, the treatment effect compared with an uncoated balloon has differed greatly among the randomized trials, with better outcomes observed with higher-dose DCBs. This European trial was desig...
متن کامل